'The most valuable feature of Meraki MX is I can manage the solution from anywhere remotely, I can throttle bandwidth, and create all rules. Many users feel SonicWall TZ can be bulky and slow and is lacking some key features. Meraki MX offers zero-touch installation, is cloud-based, and can seamlessly integrate with most of today’s popular platforms. They say it is also a robust dynamic Unified Threat Management (UTM) tool. Service and Support: Users of both solutions feel their service and support is very good.Ĭomparison Results: Users consider Meraki MX devices to be part of a comprehensive next-generation firewall solution with all the advanced security services required for today’s IT marketplace.Pricing: Users of both solutions feel the pricing is a bit expensive.However, they feel that reporting can be somewhat vague and ambiguous and should be improved. They also say the unified threat management provides a robust VPN and security intelligence for both site-to-site and remote access. Users say SonicWall TZ offers good security with application control, URL filtering, Gateway Anti-Virus, and IPS protection. Some users feel security is missing some basic features common with other solutions. Users say dual WAN connections are seamless and point-to-point VPNs automatically connect regardless of what WAN connection is active. The point-to-point VPNs can intuitively follow IP changes with no need for static IPs. Features: Meraki MX offers next generation filtration options, plus it can behave like a router and a firewall simultaneously.Ease of Deployment: Both solutions are easy and straightforward to deploy.After reading the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

We performed a comparison between Meraki MX and SonicWall TZ based on our users’ reviews in four categories.

Sonicwall tz400